2021.1.3

>LINGUISTICA PRAGENSIA 2021 (31) 1

Sprechgeschwindigkeit als Indikator der perzipierten Sprechflüssigkeit in Deutsch als Fremdsprache

Speech rate as an indicator of perceived fluency in German as foreign language

Mirjana M. Kovač (Universität Split)

 

 FULL TEXT   

 ABSTRACT (en)

The aim of this article is to evaluate perceived fluency, which according to research results refers to the impression of the listener that the psycholinguistic processes of language planning and language production work smoothly and efficiently, i.e. that these two processes can be performed by speakers almost simultaneously. The speech rate, as a predictor of perceived fluency, relates to measurable speed of spoken language and is identified as the number of syllables per unit time. A group of 14 students of German (L2) at the Faculty of Philosophy in Split took part in this study. The results of the analysis show that the speech rate in the prepared speech is approximately nine percent higher than in the unprepared speech. Based on the data, there is a significant difference between the assessments of perceived fluency, i.e. the notes for the prepared speech are significantly higher compared to the unprepared speech. The results obtained could be explained by the priming effect and, consequently, the reduced cognitive load. The conclusions of this study are comparable to previous studies, in which the speech rate is mentioned as one of the most important predictors of perceived fluency.

 KEYWORDS (en)

perceived fluency, speech fluency, speech production, speech rate

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059635.2021.1.3

 REFERENCES

Ahmadian, M. J. and M. Tavakoli (2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research 15/1, 35–59.

Airey, J. (2010) The ability of students to explain science concepts in two languages. Hermes — Journal of Language and Communication Studies 45, 35–9.

Boersma, P. and D. Weenink (2017) [software] Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.36. Abgerufen von http://fon.hum.uva.nl/praat

Bosker, H. R., A.-F. Pinget, H. Quene, T. Sanders and N. H. de Jong (2013) What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing 30/2, 159–175.

Bozorgian, H. and S. M. Kanani (2017) Task repetition on accuracy and fluency: EFL learners’ speaking skill. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies 6/2, 42–53.

Cucchiarini, C., H. Strik and L. Boves (2002) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111/6, 2862–2873.

De Jong, N. H. and C. A. Perfetti (2011) Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning 61/2, 533–568.

De Jong, N. H., M. P. Steinel, A. Florijn, R. Schoonen and J. H. Hulstijn (2013) Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 34/5, 893–916.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2007) Conclusion: The future of practice. In DeKeyser, R. M. (ed) Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology, 287–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Derwing, T. M., M. J. Rossiter, M. J. Munro and R. I. Thomson (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning 54/4, 655–679.

Götz, S. (2013) Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hincks, R. (2005) Presenting in English and Swedish. Proceedings FONETIK 2005, The XVIIIth Swedish phonetics conference, Göteborg, 45–48.

Hincks, R. (2010) Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca oral presentations. English for Specific Purposes 29/1, 4–18.

Hoffmann, S. (2014) Mündliche Kompetenz und Bewusstsein beim unterrichtlichen Fremdsprachenlernen. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.

Kormos, J. and M. Dénes (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. Systém 32/2, 145–164.

Kovač, M. M. and G. Vickov (2018) The impact of immediate task repetition on breakdown fluency, Govor 35/2, 139–159.

Kovač, M. M. and G. Vickov (2019) The influence of pre-task planning on speed and breakdown fluency, Vestnik za tuje jezike / Journal for Foreign Languages 11/1, 87–102.

Lambert, C., J. Kormos and D. Minn (2017) Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39/1, 167–196.

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40 (3), 387–417.

Lennon, P. (2000) The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In Riggenbach, H. (ed) Perspectives on fluency, 25–42. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing (2001) Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23/4, 451–468.

Požgaj Hadži, V., T. Balazic Bulc and D. Horga (2012) Speech fluency: a result of oral language proficiency? Linguistica 52/1, 87–99.

Préfontaine, Y. (2010) Differences in perceived fluency and utterance fluency across speech elicitation tasks: A pilot study. In Kaufhold K., S. McCulloch and A. Tominc (eds) Papers from the Lancaster Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching (LAEL PG), 5, 134–154.

Préfontaine, Y. (2013) Perceptions of French fluency in second language speech production. Canadian Modern Language Review 69/3, 324–348.

Préfontaine, Y. und J. Kormos (2016) A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54/2, 151–169.

Reitbrecht, S. (2017) Häsitationsphänomene in der Fremdsprache Deutsch und ihre Bedeutung für die Sprechwirkung. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

Schwenke, A. (2020) Nachrichten: mehr als informativ. Nachrichten-Sprechstile im Radio zwischen Formatierung und Hörverständlichkeit. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

Segalowitz, N. (2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.

Segalowitz, N. (2016) Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54/2, 79–95.

Tavakoli, P. and P. Foster (2011) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning 58/2, 439–473.

Thogersen, J. and J. Airey (2011) Lecturing undergraduate science in Danish and in English: A comparison of speaking rate and rhetorical style. English for Specific Purposes 30/3, 209–221.

Towell, R., R. Hawkins and N. Bazergui (1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics 17/1, 84–119.

Ullakonoja, R. (2009) Speech rate as an indicator of fluency in the Russian of Finnish learners. The Phonetics Symposium 2008. Tampere Studies in Language, Translation and Culture, Series B, Tampere, 97–109.

Zuengler, J. (1988) Identity markers and L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10/1, 33–49.

Wang Z. (2014) On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In Skehan, P. (ed) Processing perspectives on task performance, 27–62.

Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Yu, W. and V. J. van Heuven (2017) Predicting judged fluency of consecutive interpreting from acoustic measures. Interpreting 19/1,
47–68.

Úvod > 2021.1.3