See current and past issues in our e-shop
Enter e-shop
LINGUISTICA PRAGENSIA 2020 (30) 2
ABSTRACT (en)
There is a robust amount of evidence (mostly from English) suggesting that, while listening to speech, the initial part of words is scrutinised with more attention. Similarly, data suggests that stressed syllables are processed with more precision than unstressed syllables. How do these two kinds of saliencies interact? In this experimental study, the issue was investigated in a group of Italian speakers. Participants were presented with minimal pairs of nonwords differing in one individual phoneme (and specifically one trait, voicing). Nonwords were created as to contain phonological clusters in either an initial or medial position, and, similarly, stress was placed in either initial or medial position. Results show that when the clusters were in word medial position, there was a large effect of stress, with stressed syllables being recognised with greater accuracy. When the clusters were in initial position, instead, accuracy was at an intermediate level and we did not observe any effect of stress. The result is discussed in relation to previous literature addressing these phenomena in English.
KEYWORDS (en)
English phonology, Italian phonology, nonwords, perception, saliency, stress, word beginnings
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059635.2020.2.1
REFERENCES
Ambridge, B. and E. V. Lieven (2011) Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beckman, J. N. (1998) Positional faithfulness. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.
Beckman, J. N. (2013) Positional faithfulness: an optimality theoretic treatment of phonologicalasymmetries. London: Routledge.
Benasich, A. A. and P. Tallal (2002) Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behavioural brain research 136, 31–49.
Browman, C. P. (1978) Tip of the tongue and slip of the ear: implications for language processing. University of California Working Papers in Phonology 42, 1–159.
Dehaene, S. (2009) Reading in the brain, the new science of how we read. New York: Penguin Books.
Domahs, U., I. Plag and R. Carroll (2014) Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17/1, 59–96.
Echols, C. H. (1996) A role for stress in early speech segmentation. In: Morgan, J. L. and K. Demuth (eds) Signal to Syntax, 151–170. New York: Psychology Press.
Field, A., J. Miles and Z. Field (2012) Discovering statistics using R. New York: Sage Publications.
Guasti, M. T. (2004) Language acquisition: the growth of grammar. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Guttorm, T. K., P. H. Leppänen, J. A. Hämäläinen, K. M. Eklund and H. J. Lyytinen (2010) Newborn event-related potentials predict poorer pre-reading skills in children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 43/5, 391–401.
Harris, J. (2011) Deletion. In: van Oostendorp, M., C. J. Ewen, E. V. Hume and K. Rice (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1597–1621. Oxford: WileyBlackwell.
Hayes, B. (1982) Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 227–276.
Hayes, B. (2012) How predictable is Italian word stress. Hsinchu: National Chiao Tung University.
Hoonhorst, I., V. Medina, C. Colin, E. Markessis, M. Radeau, P. Deltenre and W. Serniclaes (2011) Categorical perception of voicing, colors and facial expressions: a developmental study. Speech Communication 53/3, 417–430.
Jusczyk, P. W., A. Cutler and N. J. Redanz (1993) Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child development 64/3, 675–687.
Krämer, M. (2009) The phonology of Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macmillan, N. A. and C. D. Creelman (2005) Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Männel, C. and A. Friederici (2008) Eventrelated brain potentials as a window to children’s language processing: from syllables to sentences. In: Sekerina, I. A., E. M. Fernández and H. Clahsen (eds) Language acquisition and language disorders: Vol. 44. Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing, 29–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Marshall, C. R. and H. K. van der Lely (2009) Effects of word position and stress on onset cluster production: Evidence from typical development, specific language impairment, and dyslexia. Language 85/1, 39–57.
Marslen-Wilson, W. and P. Zwitserlood (1989) Accessing spoken words: the importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15/3, 576–585.
Mehler, J., E. Dupoux, T. Nazzi and G. DehaeneLambertz (1996) Coping with linguistic diversity: the infant’s viewpoint. In: Morgan, J. L. and K. Demuth (eds) Signal to Syntax, 101–116. New York: Psychology Press.
Mora, J. C. (2005) Lexical knowledge effects on the discrimination of non-native phonemic contrasts in words and nonwords by Spanish/Catalan bilingual learners of English. In: Hazan, V. and P. Iverson (eds) ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception, Senate House, London, UK, June 15–17, 2005.
Nooteboom, S. G. (1981) Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words: Beginnings vs endings. Journal of Phonetics 9/4, 407–424.
Pitt, M. A. and A. G. Samuel (1995) Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 29/2, 149–188.
Prince, A. and P. Smolensky (1997) Optimality: From neural networks to universal grammar. Science 275/5306, 1604–1610.
Roach, P. (2000) English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saffran, J. R., R. N. Aslin and E. L. Newport (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274/5294, 1926–1928.
Smith, J. L. (2004) Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. New York: Routledge.
Walley, A. C. (1988) Spoken word recognition by young children and adults. Cognitive development 3/2, 137–165.
Zwitserlood, P. (1989) The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word
processing. Cognition 32/1, 25–64.
