See current and past issues in our e-shop
Enter e-shop
LINGUISTICA PRAGENSIA 2020 (30) 1
ABSTRACT (en)
This paper reports on an analysis of litotes in English research articles from two distant fields, life and social sciences. As a device for understatement, litotes denies the semantic opposite of what is meant to mitigate the literal content of the utterance. This feature makes litotes a useful means of academic communication which should remain cautious in tone and impartial. However, the results of the analysis reveal disciplinary variation in the frequency, structural types and syntactic functions of such constructions in the considered discipline-specific expert writing. The social sciences texts use twice as many litotes as the life sciences texts, and show a greater functional variation of litotes. There are also dissimilarities in the specific patterns by means of which the analysed structural types of litotes are realised.
KEYWORDS
academic discourse, disciplinary variation, litotes, research articles, understatement
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059635.2020.1.3
REFERENCES
Bazerman, C. (1981) What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 361–382.
Becher, T. and P. R. Trowler (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and
the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Birch, B. M. (2014) English Grammar Pedagogy: A Global Perspective. New York and Oxon:
Routledge. Available at https://books.google.pl/books?id=nd22AQAAQBAJ&printsec=front
cover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false. [last accessed 6 December 2018].
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2014) Euphemism and political discourse in the British regional
press. Brno Studies in English 40(1), 5–26.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2017) Coherence and cohesion in research articles: The role of indexicals. In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and R. Jančaříková, G. Miššíková, R. Povolná (eds) Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse, 9–28. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Dynel, M. (2018) Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert
Untruthfulness. Mouton de Gruyter.
Elbow, P. (1991) Reflections on academic discourse: How it relates to freshmen and colleagues. College English 53, 135–155.
Fang, Z. (2012) Language Correlates of Disciplinary Literacy. Topics in Language Disorders 32(1), 19–34.
Fløttum, K., T. Dahl, and T. Kinn (2006) Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Freeman, D. (2018) Seductive Academic Writing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gotti, M. (2014) Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
Gray, B. (2015) Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hamawand, Z. (2007) Suffixal Rivalry in Adjective Formation. A cognitive corpus analysis. London: Equinox.
Hamawand, Z. (2009) The Semantics of English Negative Prefixes. London: Equinox.
Hasan, R. (1996) Literacy, everyday talk and society. In: Hasan, R. and G. Williams (eds) Literacy in society, 377–424. London: Longman.
Haverkate, H. (1990) A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 77–109.
Hewings, A. and M. Hewings (2001) Anticipatory ‘itʼ in academic writing: an indicator of disciplinary difference and developing disciplinary knowledge. In: Hewings, M. (ed) Academic writing in context, 199–214. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
Hewings, M. and A. Hewings (2002) “It is interesting to note that…”: a comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21, 367–383.
Hoffmann, M. (1987) Negatio Contrarii: A Study of Latin Litotes. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Horn, L. R. (1989) A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Horn, L. R. (2017a) The Singular Square: Contrariety and Double Negation from Aristotle to Homer. In: Blochowiak, J. and C. Grisot, S. Durrlemann, C. Laenzlinger (eds) Formal Models in the Study of Language, 143–179. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Horn, L. R. (2017b) Lie-toe-tease: double negatives and unexcluded middles. Philosophical Studies 174, 79–103.
Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse.
Discourse Studies 6(2), 173–91.
Hyland, K. (2006) Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In: Hyland, K. and M. Bondi (eds) Academic Discourse Across Disciplines, 17–44. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hyland, K. (2009) Academic discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2016) General and Specific EAP. In: Hyland, K. and P. Shaw (eds) The Routledge
Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, 17–29. London and New York: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2017) Learning to write for academic purposes: Specificity and second language writing. In: Bitchenet, J. and N. Storch, R. Witte (eds.) Teaching Writing for Academic Purposes to Multilingual Students: Instructional Approaches, 24–41.
Lai, C. (2012) Rises all the way up: The interpretation of prosody, discourse attitudes and dialogue structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Available at https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~laic/dissertation/laic-diss.pdf. [last accessed 11 December 2018].
Lanham, R. A. (1991) A handlist of rhetorical terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Leech, G. N. (1969) A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London and New York: Longman.
Łyda A. and K. Warchał (2011) Ethnic and Disciplinary Cultures and Understatement: Litotic Constructions in Polish and English Linguistics and Biology Research Articles. In: Arabski, J. and A. Wojtaszek (eds) Aspects of Culture in Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning, 193–216. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Mu, C. and L. Zhang, J. Ehrich, H. Hong (2015) The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20, 135–148.
Munro, G. D., and C. A. Munro (2015) “Soft” vs “Hard” Psychological Science in the Courtroom. The Jury Expert 27(2), 1–5.
Neuhaus, L. (2016) On the relation of irony,understatement, and litotes. Pragmatics and Cognition 23(1), 117–149.
Oliveira, J. B. de (2004) Negative Prefixes in Technical and Scientific English. Paper presented at Simpósio Educação e Sociedade Contemporânea: Desafios e Propostas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro/UERJ. Available at https://www.academia.edu/5477081/NEGATIVE_PREFIXES_IN_TECHNICAL_AND_SCIENTIFIC_ENGLISH. [last accessed 10 December 2018].
Ploisawaschai, S. (2015) The Development of Authorial Identity among Senior Academic Scholars on the Trajectory of Professorship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter. Available at https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/19812/PloisawaschaiS.pdf?sequence=1. [lastaccessed 11 December 2018].
Quirk, R. and S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
Rashidi, N. and S. Shahab (2013) Disciplinary Acculturation: A Comparative Study of Intradiscourse Cycles of English and Persian Introductory Textbooks of Sociology and Linguistics. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics Studies 4(2), 33–50.
Scott, M. (2012) WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
Simonton, D. K. (2009) Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of domainspecific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4, 441–452.
Swart, H. de (2010) Expression and Interpretation of Negation: An OT Typology. Dordrecht:
Springer.
The Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM (2000) 2nd ed. Version 3.0. Oxford: OUP.
Tse, P. and K. Hyland (2006) Gender and Discipline: Exploring Metadiscourse Variation in Academic Book Reviews. In: Hyland, K. and M. Bondi (eds) Academic Discourse Across Disciplines, 177–202. Bern: Peter Lang.
Wouden, T. van der (1995) Litotes and downward monotonicity. Available at http://odur.let.rug.nl/vdwouden/docs/leipzig.pdf. [last accessed 26 November 2018].
Wouden, T. van der (1997) Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London and New York: Routledge.
Yuan, Y. (2017) The argumentative litotes in The Analects. Argument & Computation 8, 253–266.
Zlateva, P. (2002) Translation as a tool in linguistic analysis. Linguistica Antverpiensia 1,
109–125.
